tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1709537690528523236.post4681752971835040957..comments2024-03-15T06:59:20.114+10:00Comments on in my view ...: comparing 200mm FD lensesobakesanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13743339737847465926noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1709537690528523236.post-74147736187042869402010-09-30T21:26:15.886+10:002010-09-30T21:26:15.886+10:00The older f2.8 seems to have a slightly more cream...The older f2.8 seems to have a slightly more creamy bokeh in the three photo series. Might be due to the change in focal length as one focuses?Noonshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04285930853937157148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1709537690528523236.post-89148737077638689222010-09-29T02:25:02.502+10:002010-09-29T02:25:02.502+10:00I have a love/hate relationship with the FD lenses...I have a love/hate relationship with the FD lenses. They are well made and in some cases, optically better than the modern EF lenses, especially in the consumer grade lenses. But, one can't use them on EOS bodies without sacrificing image quality, and using them on micro 4/3 bodies is ok, but not ideal. With that said, I still have a collection of the FL, FD and nFD lenses. Perhaps, they will work better with Sony NEX.Lens Bubblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06445561503570800312noreply@blogger.com