tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1709537690528523236.post6577896134695651441..comments2024-03-29T05:47:08.860+10:00Comments on in my view ...: shallow portrait lenses 43rds vs Full Frame (part 2)obakesanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13743339737847465926noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1709537690528523236.post-86010639969814754602014-03-30T05:44:59.935+10:002014-03-30T05:44:59.935+10:00Hi YuLin
I agree all that. I sometimes think that...Hi YuLin<br /><br />I agree all that. I sometimes think that the general discussion of desire of shallow portrait ignores that you have to work for it to get it. I remember in working conferences (shooting on the fly) that I'd pick f4 or f5.6 on my 100mm lens so that any focus error would not leave me with the subject just (tantalizingly) out of focus.<br /><br />I sold my EF100 years ago to fund a TS-E 90 (which I've now also sold) as it was better for what I wanted to do with it.<br /><br />When I'm on the move my micro4/3 is my first choice and my full frame stuff gets pulled out perhaps once a year.<br /><br />:-)obakesanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13743339737847465926noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1709537690528523236.post-88902996554279560422014-03-30T05:20:19.202+10:002014-03-30T05:20:19.202+10:00I think it all comes down to what kind of shooting...I think it all comes down to what kind of shooting styles you prefer. For me personally, who shoots mainly on the move, a smaller camera makes more sense, but if I need to shoot stuff that moves, I would grab my 1D Mark III.<br /><br />Shallow depth of field is overrated :) <br /><br />By the way, the Canon EF 100mm f2 is absolutely underrated. It should have a red ring on the lens barrel. Perfect portrait lens on full frame.Lens Bubblehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06445561503570800312noreply@blogger.com