I have a number of issues with the way that Australia is coping with economic development like the focus on GDP over the actual trade balance making our internal services sector appear to be worth more than our exports of coal and ore. To quote from Robert Heinlein's "the moon is a harsh mistress" its like two Chinese living in a valley getting rich by selling rocks to each other.
A cute modern term bantered about these days is a "jobless recovery" which is right down the logical path Heinlein was talking about, as who will be buying stuff if less people have jobs? On this topic I was reading the ABC website and found this wonderful quote:
When asked ... whether the program would offer jobs or work experience, Employment Participation Minister Senator Mark Arbib replied: "It's a fine line but can I tell you, it is work experience but work experience is a job."
right ... tell that to someone trying to get ahead in life.
Water is one of my favourite topics. I did my masters research in the area and it is something I am passionate about. Wasting water and wasting our resources is something I feel strongly about.
I've found in the last ten years of research that the public feels strongly about water too (especially with the droughts of recent times highlighting this). But while there is often a lot of passion in this debate there is seldom a sense of objective reality and comprehension of the scale.
People seem to mind the pennies yet loose all of the pounds.
With this in mind, I was reading about this bottled water ban and wondered just why it is that people seem to be so engaged by trying to make a difference on things which really don't make a difference (in the big picture).
It was the first step in a government campaign to significantly reduce the consumption of bottled water in the community, Mr Rees said.
"It's not just the direct plastic bottle that causes the physical reality in our local environment" ... "Bear this in mind, you take a 600ml plastic bottle, 200ml of oil has gone into its production.That's leaving aside the C02 that comes from transporting it around the place.''
Sure, bottled water seems silly when we have good water in the tap (and do we?) ... but before we examine what point, lets look at a few basic facts here first to give some perspective:
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics:
7,459 L of water is needed per dollar sale of Rice (in the husk) .
Yes, you read that right, SEVEN THOUSAND LITERS OF WATER is used in providing the conditions in Australia for growing rice which then sells for a buck.
So before getting rilled up at the bottled water on the table, how about the rice under your curry?
Do you think I'll stop eating rice? Not really ... but then I buy mine imported from asian countries where they normally grow the stuff and have climates more suited to growing it.
According to another report by the Bureau of Statistics "rice production returned the lowest gross value/ML water used of $189 per million Litres". So its not even patriotic to be eating Australian rice.
To compare this with other products embodied water contents of the following products we find :
Wine 503 liters per dollar Beef products 381 liters per dollar Vegetables and fruit 103 liters per dollar Clothing 90 liters per dollar Paper products 30 liters per dollar
So when you start to look carefully about , bottled water looks quite a lame culprit doesn't it ...
While this issue does begin to make sense in the context of the attempts of some small town to save their water from some company exploitation, it does not answer why the NSW State Government is so quick to follow up with bans at state and perhaps National levels. According to this report Mr Garret (0ur environment minister) says:
Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett said state governments should consider banning bottled water from their departments - following NSW Premier Nathan Rees' lead.
Why? Heck, if its sucking water up out of the ground and putting it into plastic bottles that worries you, what about all the sweetened soft drinks ... I bet they're bigger sellers anyway!
So rather than picking political winners how (desalination plant on the Gold Coast anyone?) how about letting the freem market have its way, not to mention having a good look at the facts before putting political muscle behind some movement and snowballing it.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2002). The influence of lifestyles on environmental pressure. Retrieved 20 May 2004
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2004, 18 March 2005). Australians Use More Than 1 Million Litres of Fresh Water Per Person Each Year. Retrieved 1 April 2005
This adaptor is cheap and will get your lens onto your camera, but its mechanically flimsy and the multi part construction with poor quality screws leading to issues with accurate alignment are the weak points. If you value adapter accuracy, reliable build and high quality then look to the ciecio7 (a polish eBay seller) adapter on eBay. I have been using his for some time now and they are machined from a single billet of alloy. They are robust and reliable and very well priced. note: I have nothing to do with ciecio7, I just like his gear. See my views on the free marketInvisible Hand.
He has been iteratively developing them for some time and you can find my posts on those adapters here. At the time of writing this blog post I was initially quite unable to say what I wanted without an amount of whinge from the Chinese ebay seller. As this post is still popular I thought I'd add this 'prelude'. The rest remains as it always has been.
I've been using a few FD lenses on my G1 and been reasonably happy with the adaptor that I have been using. You can read about that adaptor here.
Someone wrote to me suggesting that jinfinances adaptor (the adaptor shown here) had exactly this in his latest model.
I asked jinfinance (the eBay seller) and he seemed not to be sure if it did or if it did not, however he was kind enough to lend me one for me to review on my blog and to answer my question.
So, the answer is yes it does. The adaptor has some interesting features which I'll describe.
The physical:
If you look carefully at the above image you can see a groove which allows the lens iris operation coupling pin to move. Its operated by grasping the grip ring just behind the lens mount and turning it a few degrees. This is perhaps also visible in the image below.
and in close up
This then operates the mechanical stop down lever on the lens to close the aperture to the size you've set on the lens aperture control.
Why would you want to do this? Well it does make it easier to focus with the lens wide open (especially if its dim) and its also easier to pick exactly where critical focus is with the lens fully open too.Since I've been using an adaptor without this feature for some time I was keen to see if it would make a significant difference in operation.
As I've been using OM lenses I have essentially had the same operation by removing the coupling pin from the adaptor and using the Depth of Field preview button that is standard on the OM lenses. This has shown me that sometimes its handy, and sometimes its not. Particularly I find that when working on a tripod photographing birds at a nest, or when trying to follow focus small ducklings that its not. Either I'm trying not to shake the camera or just too occupied with othe controls.
When working with photographing people with mid range lenses its handy. However with the FD lens (unlike the OM lens) and on this adaptor I need to rotate a ring rather than press a button. In this case I found that it is not as neat a method and gets in the way of foucs and operation.
The reason for this partly due to the ring being so close to the aperture, partly due to the ring being stiff to turn, and partly due to it being all quite cramped in there.
This image shows a couple of things; firstly don't snack on oily chips when handling a matte black camera for photography.
Ahem ... well anyway, the already snug space between the grip and the lens is taken up a bit more by the adaptor. Personally I can get my fingers in there, but I'm sure what the people who complain that the camera is tiny (NB with big fingers) may have a different report. As readers of my blog may recall, I already have an adaptor from Ciecio7 , looking at that adaptor you can see the difference between the two.
maybe its easier to see this when morphing from one adaptor to another
Essentially the RJ adaptor is wider than the base of the lens and its a little bulkier.
There is one last important point in the physical, that is concerning mounting the adaptor and engaging the aperture diaphragm or iris when you mount the lens on the adaptor.
The RJ adaptor gets around a problem which seems to afflict all of the other FD lens adaptors, by having the rotating ring around the outside to engage and disengage the iris control this adaptor gets around the problem of needing to engage the FD iris coupler during the mounting process and the iris coupling is engaged by turning the ring after mounting.
To mount the adaptor and then engage the iris coupler you there is a green dot (visible on the first picture), line this up with the red dot on the chrome part and also red dot lens. Then mount and turn the lens normally. The iris is then engaged and stopped down by turning the ring on the outside of the adaptor (which moves the engaging pin as in the diagram above).
One of the things I've notice with the other adaptor (and indeed this one if you don't decouple before dismounting) that some of my FD lenses are a bit difficult to unmount. In particular when using extension tubes this is quite important, as I can't take my lens off and add a tube without using this system.
This means that with the RJ Camera adaptor and using macro extension tubes I can start with an extension tube which I think is about right (but perhaps a little short) and I can then add another tube without taking it all apart. By decoupling the iris, I can simply remove the lens (leaving extension tube and adaptor on the camera) add another few mm of extension tube onto my stack and put the lens back on. This can be a pain, but lately I've been getting pretty good at guessing first hit what extension I need. This makes me wonder if the design is intended to give aperture operation or simplify mounting?
Either way this ability to couple and uncouple the iris provides macro and extension tube users with a significant benefit.
So from the physical side:
its well made,
looks great has,
gives manual control over the aperture and
is easier to mount and dismount a the lens
Infinity Focus
To test this on this adaptor I used my FD 28mm lens, as the shorter focal lengths are more sensitive to the precision of the adaptor length than longer focal lenghts are. What I found was that with the lens wide open that the RJ adaptor is a little short of infinity. The bottom image is the RJ and the top is the Ciecio7 adaptor...
Its not huge, but the RJ adaptor is not reaching infinity. When I first got the Adaptor from Ciecio7 I found that it too was not focusing at infinity, and I found that the solution to this was to lap down the front surface. Given that design was a single piece of alloy turned down the right shape, it made sence to simply hone down the front surface. However with this lens I'm not sure if I'd like to do that.
summary
I like both these adaptors. I'd be tempted to modify the RJ adaptor to bring in infinity focus. Having discussed previously my thoughts on the adaptor and infinity focus issues I don't think its a significant issue. Certainly by f8 you can't really pick much difference. Is it significant to you? Well I guess it depends on how much you take landscape images of infinity using f2.8
I thought I'd leave you with a side by side of the two adaptors. To me the RJ adaptor is s very nice looking piece of gear that does the job, provides nicer mounting and un-mounting and the ability to open and close the iris for focus and taking with out moving your aperture ring. The Ciecio7 adaptor is more simple both in looks and operation, but then its also cheaper and does the job just as well. Both need some honing to have them infinity focus perfectly.
In my view the Ciecio7 is great value for money (being cheaper), is simply and solidly made and gives me more room for my fingers between the lens ang the grip. The RJ adaptor has the bonus of being able to engage and dis-engage the aperture coupling during mounting (making some things easier as mentioned above) and allows you to open and close the aperture without changing its settings (should that be important to you)
The rest is your call :-)
post scriptum: infinity focus revisited - problem solved
I received an email from RJ Camera asking me to check that the adaptor plate was properly torqued down and asking me to check again the infinity focus.
He felt that this may make the difference. It is after all only small fractions of a mm we're talking about so I pulled out my jewelers screwdriver and found that I could indeed torque it down about 1/3 to 1/2 a turn on each of the three screws.
I then put on the lens and took another shot ... sure, the lighting has changed, but this is now compared to the image from the Ciecio7 adaptor (the top one in the previous comparison) and its more or less identical. Here is a 100% pixel view:
So, this means that before you get concerned about your infinity focus, to check that all the screws are properly tightened.
But I advise you to be quite careful in doing this.
Do not apply too much pressure on your screwdriver or you may strip the thread (it is into aluminum after all)
use a proper sized screwdriver (most hardware stores and many supermarkets sell a small set for less than $10)
Once you are happy with focus, I would recommend putting the smallest amount of some kind of thread lock cement on them to prevent them from vibrating loose in future. Perhaps it is something which the manufacturer could consider?
I was at Porvoo this weekend (which was nice but the weather was typically Finnish. Here's a sample image of the docks).
anyway, as we were driving out to go sight seeing something shuffled across the road fast.
and we both said "hedgehog".
But this time it was a big male, and I was not going to let him get away without getting a closer look. So armed with some gloves I keep in the car I went and found him in the bush.
He immediately curled up into their distinctive little ball and was absolutely not going to come out while I was holding him (would you?)
So I put him on the grass and we sat back and waited for him to relax.
While he was waiting he seemed to be taking occasional deep breaths and releasing them slowly, just like when people are pissed off and waiting not so patiently ... sigh ...
So he sat curled up like a bundle in a sleeping bag made of prickles and waited. With his eyes tightly shut.
we thought it was best to put him back in the hedge and go back to what we were doing ... after all he might have been on his way to something important, and we wouldn't want to make him late.
