First the overviews:
Nokia E72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c12f2/c12f24cc2aa923c7c6d0cb7cbf363fcd9da4e46e" alt=""
iPhone 4s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15229/1522988510d8280d8576b6ccf59b386d33f1ccdd" alt=""
Clearly the cameras both made slightly different exposure decisions. None were adjusted or biased by settings. Personally I think that the Nokia did a better job of getting in the entire scene without blow-outs of the whites. That's just my thoughts though. Also it would seem that the angle of view of the iPhone is a bit wider than that of the Nokia. So this would give the Nokia a slight advantage in needing to squeeze in less image onto the same pixels ...
Now, at 100% pixel view ..
Nokia E72
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c563c/c563cd066d70694bb87756fe416ced6e7fbc629b" alt=""
iPhone 4s
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b71d/0b71d7661dd1849904a1682554ff396cb1b0e456" alt=""
Personally I think that the iPhone is less well sharpened than the Nokia is (and I'm sure both apply some cunning sharpening on the image). I think that if you want a better shot than either of these use a proper camera.
Certainly both are good enough to make the owners of either wonder why they'd take a snapshot camera anywhere anymore.
So there you have it
No comments:
Post a Comment