data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b99a3/b99a3fafb6ae86b81534a6c002476c51f6b9cbd0" alt=""
I scanned the wedge as a linear full range positive and then input the median values obtained from each 'patch'. That's the blue line is the scan value (255 - 0) returned, the red line is the Log10 of that.
Looking at the straight numerical levels shows that it really starts to plateau out at about 17 on the step wedge. It seems like a good result, but when compared to the much older 3200 its not that much different.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba6f7/ba6f7899921ae9e6c7165bc1674898a96c210b14" alt=""
I don't know if this is a good or a bad thing as film already has non-linear responses in the shoulder of the curve anyway.
Well, anyway it seems that the 4990 goes into the shadows a little better than the 3200, but despite how it seems on scanning film its not screamingly better when measured.
No comments:
Post a Comment