This chart shows the sizes for those who aren't familiar with this
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abcd5/abcd5c9848d480b32171917599e71ef5234817b9" alt=""
One of the things I'm finding about smaller format digital is that I'm often out of my preferred depth, as in depth of field. I happen to like controlling Depth of field and I understand that the inability to do this is exactly why I'm unhappy with most of my digital images.
For instance, I took this image of a Stone God around a temple (facing out) in Korea,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c0eb/4c0ebb0c134bf195f7b19c62ffd2059b5dde2f4a" alt="?"
however its just that little uninteresting in some ways. Now if I'd have had my 35mm camera and my TS-E 45mm with me I'd have probably taken something like this (which I munged up quickly in photoshop to see)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e4b6/9e4b6720b761c15fcfa892b2b94c19c7520ac36e" alt="?"
personally I prefer this ability to control focus, and its the reason I like taking images with my LF camera (and my 35mm when I had the TS-E lenses). Images like the ones below make use of focus to control interest
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bec47/bec4759d26d7f3016ccec3311303f9602dcc0506" alt="Japanese LF"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3215/b321582268a6fcd5032c16f8cb2e0aeecf2f6c0e" alt="Japanese LF"
and small format digital is just too deep a depth of field and I just can't do that.
So I feel better in the shallow areas.
Don't get me wrong, its not like all my photographs are this way, some are deliberately worked to get as full a depth of field as I can:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50018/50018c491afd2c5a1645f26d6ba4c6b82b7612a6" alt="Australian LF"
but its nice to have the choice :-)
Now of course I can get a full frame camera (and re-buy my TS-E lenses) but that might just be out of my budget right now ...
sigh
No comments:
Post a Comment